Why learn HTML code?

In today's world, ruled by the Internet, everyone wants to build a website, and the biggest question comes into play: How? The investigation begins, most often in the same media that tries to enter, and you end up with more questions than answers. How do you handle this amount of information? The opinions of those already in are always different and you end up lost at the beginning.

This may happen because the answer to the questions "should learn HTML code or just use a WYSIWYG editor? What is best for me?" more dependent on your expectations, needs and intentions and not only on the characteristics of the available tools. While some people prefer using a square measuring things because they have more uses, others prefer the rule as it is more portable. Each object has its advantages and disadvantages and can not say exactly which one is better. So to clarify this point let's look at the differences between HTML and WYSIWYG editors.

Learning time

This is the biggest advantage of WYSIWYG editors because building a website with them is easier and more intuitive. Those who have ever written a letter in a word processor or have drawn a picture in an image editor will understand what this means. For those who never used it as opening a web page on your browser and be able to click on the text and start editing, resizing, color, moving images, changing, and so on., All through clicks, bars tools and menus.

On the other hand, writing HTML tends to be more complicated, even when it is a simple language. HTML is a markup language or labeling, and the reason that makes it easier than other languages ​​is that the resulting web page is interpreted by a code (it has no cycles, functions, or variables that change their value). Anyway, learning HTML can produce long-term benefits once you've gone through the learning experience.

Construction time

this is a diffuse point, since many people think the method they use is better and faster. The truth is that this time depends greatly on the level of expertise of the designer, but even if the difference may be negligible, it is more likely that a website can be completed faster with a WYSIWYG editor.

Knowledge

Even when knowledge can be acquired anywhere (if you know how), in this case HTML offers more possibilities to expand your mind and raise your IQ. It's a good point if you're trying to learn beyond it. Write HTML will give you practice while being a simple language, we introduce the programming world (also part of web design and development).

Portability

While HTML code can be written in any text editor, even the most basic, you can not build a website in a WYSIWYG editor if you have the editor. This can become a portability problem for those who do not know HTML because they will need to have the editor installed on the computer you want to use to construct, modify or update a website (no matter how big or small the update is).

Correctness of the code

When using a WYSIWYG editor, the page is built by the user in visual form that is translated into HTML code by the editor engine. It means that the direct responsible of writing the HTML is the editor, even when the directives are given by the designer. This often makes the pages have the wrong code, malformed or nonstandard and often additional meta tags (unwanted).

By using HTML, the only person that decides what goes and what code code is the designer. You have the freedom and authority to choose how the code is written in your HTML document, if you respect the standards, whether it will be accessible, and more.

Scope

How far can you go building websites using WYSIWYG editors? Well, as far as the program allows. Today's WYSIWYG editors provide easy solutions and advanced designers incorporating markup languages ​​or labeling, server-side languages, languages ​​of the lake client plug-ins and more. This will help designers to build web pages and fill them with effects, functionality and interactivity. This is good, and is very good if you're not interested in moving to a higher level, given that the functions provided by the publisher (or other sources) will work perfectly with your expectations.

On the other hand, HTML is just HTML, but if you are visionary, you'll see that HTML is the gateway to further learning which has, as mentioned above, a long-term benefit. It is best to learn HTML, and any other language, is that you are not limited to the number of functions that the editor has to offer. You can always create your own functions and code, which will look and feel exactly as you want them.

Credibility

If you're working for a client, or trying to, is not the same as saying you know and handle HTML that say that you only a WYSIWYG editor. Knowing HTML gives you an extract from the point: credibility.

A third option comes into play if you decide to learn both. Most WYSIWYG editors have the option of parallel edition of HTML code that opens a new possibility. Anyway, you can always edit the HTML files generated by the editor. In this way, you can get the benefits of both.

In conclusion, the best way to go depends on your intentions. HTML is more difficult to learn but more customizable and independent, or WYSIWYG editors, easier but more editor-dependent. If your intention is to "just design a website" then you can find a proper WYSIWYG editor, but if you're watching then seriously HTML web design is essential.